Wendy D. Smith

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Count 1 Not Guilty

There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that from on or about December 9, 2004, to on or about January 19, 2005, or for some time period therein, Police Officer Smith engaged in secondary employment while on the medical roll and/or while on convalescent duty from the Chicago Police Department.

Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.

Count 1 Not Guilty

There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that from on or about December 9, 2004, to on or about January 19, 2005,or for some time period therein, Police Officer Smith engaged in secondary employment while on the medical roll and/or while on convalescent duty from the Chicago Police Department, and thereby did not violate General Order 89-84V-K.

Making a false report, written or oral.

Count 1 Not Guilty

There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about February 9, 2005, Police Officer Smith submitted a false To/From report to Lieutenant Michael Stevens of the 211d District.

Failure to obey Department orders concerning other employment, occupation, or profession.

Count 1 Not Guilty

There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that from on or about December 9, 2004, to on or about January 19, 2005, or for some time period therein, Police Officer Smith engaged in secondary employment while on the medical roll and/or while on convalescent duty from the Chicago Police Department.