Rule 1 |
8 counts
|
Violation of any law or ordinance.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, at approximately 2:03 a.m., in the vicinity of 12400 South Morgan Street, while off duty, he, having been given a visual or audible signal by a peace officer directing him to bring his vehicle to a stop, willfully failed or refused to obey such direction, in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-204.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, at approximately 2:03 a.m., in the vicinity of 12400 South Morgan Street, while off duty, he operated a vehicle at a speed of approximately 85 miles per hour in a 25 miles per hour zone, in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-601.5.
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he failed to stop at a stop sign at one or more of the following locations: 12400 South Morgan Street, 12400 South Throop Street, and
12400 South Ada Street, in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-1204(b).
-
Count 4
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he committed reckless driving by driving a vehicle with a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property, in violation of
625 ILCS 5/11-503(a)(1).
-
Count 5
Not Guilty
On or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he drove under the influence of alcohol in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a) (2).
-
Count 6
Not Guilty
On or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he drove while the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath was 0.08 or more, in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(1).
-
Count 7
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he knowingly resisted or obstructed the performance of the authorized acts of Calumet Park police officers, in violation of 720 ILCS 5/31-1.
-
Count 8
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he committed battery in that he intentionally or knowingly without legal justification caused bodily harm to or made physical contact of an insulting or provoking nature with Officer Mark Kozeluh and/or Officer Mark Kashirsky of the Calumet Park Police Department, in violation of 720 ILCS 5/12-3.
|
Rule 2 |
11 counts
|
Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, at approximately 2:03 a.m., in the vicinity of 12400 South Morgan Street, while off duty, he, having been given a visual or audible signal by a peace officer directing him to bring his vehicle to a stop, failed or refused to obey such direction.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, at approximately 2:03 a.m., in the vicinity of 12400 South Morgan Street, while off duty, he operated a vehicle at a speed of approximately 85 miles per hour in a 25 miles per hour zone.
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he failed to stop at a stop sign at one or more of the following
locations: 12400 South Morgan Street, 12400 South Throop Street, and
12400 South Ada Street.
-
Count 4
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he drove a vehicle with a disregard for the safety of persons or property.
-
Count 5
Not Guilty
On or about December 24, 2004, while off duty,he drove a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
-
Count 6
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he resisted or obstructed the performance of the authorized acts of one or more Calumet Park police officers.
-
Count 7
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he caused bodily harm to or made inappropriate physical contact with Officer Mark Kozeluh and/or Officer Mark Kashirsky of the Calumet Park Police Department.
-
Count 8
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he used profanities or other inappropriate or offensive language, and/or made threats directed at one or more Calumet Park police officers, such as one or more of the following: "Fuck yeah I'm a cop, so fucking what?"; "What the fuck do you want?"; "You ain't cuffing me."; and "I've got you bitches now, you are going down for this."; or words to that effect.
-
Count 9
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he resisted Calumet Park police officers' attempts to handcuff him and/or take him into custody by doing one or more of the following: flailing his arms, pushing the officer(s), and thrashing his arms and legs while on the ground.
-
Count 10
Not Guilty
On or about December 24, 2004, he submitted to a Breathalyzer Test which disclosed that he had a blood alcohol content of 0.152.
-
Count 11
Not Guilty
On or about June 16, 2005, he pled guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol and received two years court supervision.
|
Rule 8 |
1 count
|
Disrespect to or maltreatment of any person, while on or off duty.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he used profanities or other inappropriate or offensive language, and/or made threats directed at one or more Calumet Park police officers, such as one or more of the following: "Fuck yeah I'm a cop, so fucking what?"; "What the fuck do you want?"; "You ain't cuffing me."; and "I've got you bitches now, you are going down for this."; or words to that effect.
|
Rule 9 |
1 count
|
Engaging in any unjustified verbal or physical altercation with any person, while on or off duty.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
There was insufficient evidence presented by the Superintendent to prove that on or about December 24, 2004, while off duty, he resisted Calumet Park police officers' attempts to handcuff him and/or take him into custody by doing one or more of the following: flailing his arms, pushing the officer(s), and thrashing his arms and legs while on the ground.
|
Rule 15 |
1 count
|
Intoxication on or off duty.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
On or about December 24, 2004, he submitted to a Breathalyzer Test which disclosed that he had a blood alcohol content of 0.152.
|