From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system.

Sean Ryan

Case #: 06PB2614
Police badge #: 11534
Download original case files
- 06PB2614_Decision.pdf

Recommendation Termination
Decision Return to duty
Length of process 11 months September 20, 2006 to August 16, 2007 Closed

Investigative Agency Not Specified

Charged with violating 3 rules on 3 counts

Show all counts


Rule 1	1 count	Violation of any law or ordinance. Count 1 Not Guilty The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that on or about February 16, 2006, Police Officer Sean P. Ryan provided a urine specimen that contained Boldenone metabolites, and that he possessed an anabolic steroid on or before February 16, 2006, in violation of Chapter 720 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, Section 570/402 (d).
Rule 2	1 count	Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department. Count 1 Not Guilty The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that on or about February 16, 2006, Police Officer Sean P. Ryan provided a urine specimen that contained Boldenone metabolites, and thus he possessed and/or used or ingested an anabolic steroid.
Rule 6	1 count	Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral. Count 1 Not Guilty The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that on or about February 16, 2006, Police Officer Sean P. Ryan provided a urine specimen that contained Boldenone metabolites, and thus he used an anabolic steroid in violation of Administrative Special Order 05-01, III-B.

Rule 1

1 count

Violation of any law or ordinance.

Rule 2

1 count

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Rule 6

1 count

Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.

Board Member Votes & Decisions

Majority Decision

7 agreed

Agreed with the final decision of the board

0 disagreed

Disagreed with the final decision of the board

2 did not vote

Did not vote or were not present for voting

Minority Opinions

It is important to understand the cases detailed here are a significant minority of the total complaints filed against officers. A typical year sees about 3–5% of complaints against officers result in a sustained finding of misconduct. A very small percentage of those sustained findings result in discipline that would require the police board to get involved. The data used for this website is taken directly from Police Board documents. The documents were obtained through the Illinois Freedom of Information act. All the documents used as the basis of this website are available for download from the individual case pages. The Chicago Justice Project is an independent transparency organization and is not affiliated in any way with the Chicago Police Board or any other justice agency in Chicago or Cook County.

Chicago Police Board Information Center

From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system. | Sign in