From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system.

Sammie Parr III

Case #: 07PB2642
Police badge #: 8129
Download original case files
- 07PB2642_Decision.pdf

Recommendation Termination
Decision Return to duty
Length of process 11 months June 19, 2007 to May 15, 2008 Closed

Investigative Agency Not Specified

Charged with violating 3 rules on 3 counts

Show all counts


Rule 2	1 count	Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department. Count 1 Not Guilty The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that on or about April 18, 2006, the Respondent engaged in secondary employment while on the medical roll of the Chicago Police Department, in that he worked for U2P Security Incorporated.
Rule 6	1 count	Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral. Count 1 Not Guilty The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that on or about April 18, 2006, the Respondent engaged in secondary employment while on the medical roll of the Chicago Police Department, in that he worked for U2P Security, Incorporated, thereby violating General Order 89-8-IV- K.
Rule 23	1 count	Failure to obey Department orders concerning other employment, occupation, or profession. Count 1 Not Guilty The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that on or about April 18, 2006, the Respondent engaged in secondary employment while on the medical roll of the Chicago Police Department, in that he worked for U2P Security, Incorporated, although General Order 89-8-IV-K prohibits secondary employment while on the Medical Roll.

Rule 2

1 count

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Rule 6

1 count

Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.

Rule 23

1 count

Failure to obey Department orders concerning other employment, occupation, or profession.

Board Member Votes & Decisions

Majority Decision

8 agreed

Agreed with the final decision of the board

1 disagreed

Disagreed with the final decision of the board

William Kirkling

0 did not vote

Did not vote or were not present for voting

Minority Opinions

It is important to understand the cases detailed here are a significant minority of the total complaints filed against officers. A typical year sees about 3–5% of complaints against officers result in a sustained finding of misconduct. A very small percentage of those sustained findings result in discipline that would require the police board to get involved. The data used for this website is taken directly from Police Board documents. The documents were obtained through the Illinois Freedom of Information act. All the documents used as the basis of this website are available for download from the individual case pages. The Chicago Justice Project is an independent transparency organization and is not affiliated in any way with the Chicago Police Board or any other justice agency in Chicago or Cook County.

Chicago Police Board Information Center

From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system. | Sign in