From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system.

Kendrick Francisco

Case #: 07PB2656
Police badge #: 16336
Download original case files
- 07PB2656_Decision.pdf

Recommendation Termination
Decision Termination
Length of process about 1 year September 20, 2007 to November 20, 2008 Closed

Investigative Agency Not Specified

Charged with violating 3 rules on 3 counts

Show all counts


Rule 1	1 count	Violation of any law or ordinance. Count 1 Not Guilty On or about February 15, 2007, he provided a urine specimen which contained cocaine metabolites, thereby violating 720 ILCS 570/402 by possessing some amount of cocaine on or before February 15, 2007.
Rule 2	1 count	Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department. Count 1 Not Guilty (5)The Respondent, Police Officer Karen Oaks, Star No. 19927, as charged herein, is guilty of violating, to-wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that:From in or around 2002, to the date the charges were filed, or for some period of time therein, the Respondent fraternized and/or maintained an association with Michael Meyers, an individual convicted of one or more felonies and/or misdemeanors.
Rule 6	1 count	Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral. Count 1 Not Guilty On or about February 15, 2007, he provided a urine specimen which contained cocaine metabolites, thereby violating Administrative Special Order 05-01, Article III, Section B.

Rule 1

1 count

Violation of any law or ordinance.

Rule 2

1 count

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Rule 6

1 count

Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.

Board Member Votes & Decisions

Majority Decision

8 agreed

Agreed with the final decision of the board

0 disagreed

Disagreed with the final decision of the board

1 did not vote

Did not vote or were not present for voting

Phyllis L. Apelbaum

Minority Opinions

It is important to understand the cases detailed here are a significant minority of the total complaints filed against officers. A typical year sees about 3–5% of complaints against officers result in a sustained finding of misconduct. A very small percentage of those sustained findings result in discipline that would require the police board to get involved. The data used for this website is taken directly from Police Board documents. The documents were obtained through the Illinois Freedom of Information act. All the documents used as the basis of this website are available for download from the individual case pages. The Chicago Justice Project is an independent transparency organization and is not affiliated in any way with the Chicago Police Board or any other justice agency in Chicago or Cook County.

Chicago Police Board Information Center

From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system. | Sign in