William Hronopoulous

The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that on or about December 23 and/or 24, 2004, at or near 240 East 108th Street, Chicago, the
Respondent was involved in theft of property, when he knowingly obtained and/or exerted unauthorized control over property of the owner, namely, a Toshiba laptop computer, in violation of Chapter 720 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, Section 5/16-1.

From on or about December 23 until on or about December 25, 2004, or for some period of time therein, he knowingly and without the authorization of the owner
and/or in excess of the authority granted to him, accessed or caused to be accessed a computer or any part thereof, or a program or data, namely, of a Toshiba laptop computer, in violation of Chapter 720 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, Section 5/16(D)-3(a)

On or about December 23 and/or 24, 2004, at or near 240 East 108th Street,
Chicago, he took possession of a Toshiba laptop computer without authorization, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department

On or about December 23, 2004, at or near 240 East 108th
Street, Chicago, he failed to properly inventory a Toshiba laptop computer belonging to Brint White, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing
discredit upon the Department.

From on or about December 23 until on or about December 25, 2004, or for some period of time therein, he attempted to view data on a Toshiba laptop computer belonging to Brint White without consent and/or without a search warrant, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing
discredit upon the Department.

The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that in or before April 2005, the Respondent had knowledge that another Department member,Corey Flagg, took without authorization one or more watches during a search warrant
executed on Sheridan Road, Chicago, and the Respondent failed to notify a supervisor of the theft, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.

The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that in or before April 2005, the Respondent had knowledge that another Department member, Corey Flagg, took without authorization one or more watches during a search warrant
executed on Sheridan Road, Chicago, and the Respondent attempted to assist Flagg with determining the value of the stolen watch(es) by searching the intern& and/or taking the watch(es) to Jeweler's Row to have the watch(es) appraised, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the
Department

The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that on or about December 23, 2004, in Chicago, the Respondent used his official position for personal gain or influence when he took unauthorized possession of a laptop computer, the personal property of an arrestee, Brint White.

On or about December 23, 2004, he failed to follow proper procedures for
inventorying recovered property by taking into his personal possession and/or removing a recovered Toshiba laptop computer, in violation of General Order 81-01, thereby disobeying an order or directive, whether written or oral.

From on or about December 23 until on or about December 25, 2004, or for some period of time therein, he attempted to view data on a Toshiba laptop computer belonging to Brint White without consent and/or without a search warrant, in violation of General Order 81-01-01, thereby disobeying an order or directive, whether written or oral.

The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that in or before
April 2005, the Respondent had knowledge that another Department member, Corey Flagg, took without authorization one or more watches during a search warrant executed on Sheridan Road, Chicago, and the Respondent failed to notify a supervisor of the theft, thus failing to report promptly to the Department any information concerning any crime
or other unlawful action.

The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that in or before April 2005, the Respondent had knowledge that Police Officer Corey Flagg took without authorization one or more watches during the execution of a search warrant on Sheridan
Road, Chicago, and the Respondent failed to notify a supervisor of the theft, thereby failing to report to the Department any violation of Rules and Regulations or any other improper conduct which is contrary to the policy, orders or directives of the Department.