Rule 1 |
2 counts
|
Violation of any law or ordinance.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
- On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King,
located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary
investigation, and/or he ignored information provided by witnesses Shawn Nelson and/or
Joseph Mularczyk regarding their observation(s) that Obed DeLeon was not the
aggressor/offender and/or that Obed DeLeon was the victim of a beating and/or that a gun
was pointed at Obed DeLeon, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy
and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
- On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King,
located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary
investigation of the incident inside Taco Burrito King in that he failed to interview patrons
and/or witnesses and/or employees, and/or he failed to review the surveillance video, and/or
he failed to make attempts to identify the man with a gun, thereby impeding the Department's
efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.
|
Rule 10 |
2 counts
|
Inattention to duty.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
- On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King,
located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary
investigation, and/or he ignored information provided by witnesses Shawn Nelson and/or
Joseph Mularczyk regarding their observation(s) that Obed DeLeon was not the
aggressor/offender and/or that Obed DeLeon was the victim of a beating and/or that a gun
was pointed at Obed DeLeon, thereby being inattentive to duty.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
- On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King,
located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary
investigation of the incident inside Taco Burrito King in that he failed to interview patrons
and/or witnesses and/or employees, and/or he failed to review the surveillance video, and/or
he failed to make attempts to identify the man with a gun, thereby being inattentive to duty.
|