Louis Danielson

Violation of any law or ordinance.

Count 1 Not Guilty

On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King, located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary investigation, and/or he ignored information provided by witnesses Shawn Nelson and/or Joseph Mularczyk regarding their observation(s) that Obed DeLeon was not the aggressor/offender and/or that Obed DeLeon was the victim of a beating and/or that a gun was pointed at Obed DeLeon, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.

Count 2 Not Guilty

On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King, located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary investigation of the incident inside Taco Burrito King in that he failed to interview patrons and/or witnesses and/or employees, and/or he failed to review the surveillance video, and/or he failed to make attempts to identify the man with a gun, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.

Inattention to duty.

Count 1 Not Guilty

On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King, located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary investigation, and/or he ignored information provided by witnesses Shawn Nelson and/or Joseph Mularczyk regarding their observation(s) that Obed DeLeon was not the aggressor/offender and/or that Obed DeLeon was the victim of a beating and/or that a gun was pointed at Obed DeLeon, thereby being inattentive to duty.

Count 2 Not Guilty

On or about March 24, 2006, while responding to an incident at Taco Burrito King, located at 5509 North Harlem Avenue, Chicago, he failed to conduct a thorough preliminary investigation of the incident inside Taco Burrito King in that he failed to interview patrons and/or witnesses and/or employees, and/or he failed to review the surveillance video, and/or he failed to make attempts to identify the man with a gun, thereby being inattentive to duty.