Rule 1 |
5 counts
|
Violation of any law or ordinance.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following
charge: “On or about September 8, 2010, while being interviewed by the Medical Integrity
Unit, Officer Moore engaged in any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s
efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department in that Officer
Moore claimed that she would occasionally help home health care provider Gladys
Weatherly caring for Ann Schranz by feeding Ms. Schranz and sitting with her in the evening
until bedtime when her duties, in fact, consisted of taking all physical care of Ms. Schranz,
including bathing, changing diapers, moving Ms. Schranz in and out of bed and/or her
wheelchair, feeding, and as-needed cooking and/or cleaning of Ms. Schranz’s residence
located in or around Des Plaines, Illinois.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following
charge: “On or about September 8, 2010, while being interviewed by the Medical Integrity
Unit, Officer Moore engaged in any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s
efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department in that Officer
Moore claimed that she worked four (4) to five (5) days a week caring for Ms. Ann Schranz
and was paid between $65 to $80/day when Moore was, in fact, paid approximately $120/day
for her care of Ms. Schranz for the time period of January 29, 2010, through July 28, 2010.”
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the
following charge: “From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or
on one or more dates therein, Officer Moore engaged in any action or conduct which impedes
the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the
Department in that Officer Moore claimed that the care she provided to Ann Schranz did not
violate any of Officer Moore’s medical restrictions per the Medical Services Section, when
Officer Moore performed duties including bathing, changing diapers, moving Ms. Schranz in
and out of bed and/or her wheelchair, feeding, and as-needed cooking and/or cleaning of Ms.
Schranz’s residence that would necessarily require her to violate the restriction to perform no
work at all using the affected extremity.”
-
Count 4
Not Guilty
From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or on one or
more dates therein, Officer Moore engaged in any action or conduct which impedes the
Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,
in that Officer Moore violated General Order 08-01 by working secondary employment as a
home health care worker and/or “aid assistant” to a home health care provider for Ann
Schranz when Officer Moore was on the medical roll
-
Count 5
Not Guilty
From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or on one or
more dates therein, Officer Moore engaged in any action or conduct which impedes the
Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,
in that Officer Moore failed to comply with the instructions provided by the Medical Services
Section by working secondary employment as a home health care worker and/or “aid
assistant” to a home health care provider for Ann Schranz, and by performing duties
including bathing, changing diapers, moving Ms. Schranz in and out of bed and/or her wheelchair, feeding, and as-needed cooking and/or cleaning of Ms. Schranz’s residence that
would necessarily require Officer Moore to violate the restriction to perform no work at all
using the affected extremity.
|
Rule 3 |
1 count
|
Any failure to promote the Department's efforts to implement its policy or accomplish its goals.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or on one or more
dates therein, Officer Moore failed to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its
policy or accomplish its goals, in that Officer Moore worked secondary employment in
contradiction to General Order 08-01, which prohibits officers on the medical roll from
working secondary employment.
|
Rule 6 |
1 count
|
Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or on one or more
dates therein, Officer Moore disobeyed an order or directive, whether written or oral, in that
Officer Moore violated General Order 08-01 by working secondary employment as a home
health care worker and/or “aid assistant” to a home health care provider for Ann Schranz
when Officer Moore was on the medical roll.
|
Rule 14 |
3 counts
|
Making a false report, written or oral.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following
charge: “On or about September 8, 2010, while being interviewed by the Medical Integrity
Unit, Officer Moore made a false report, written or oral, when Officer Moore stated that she
would occasionally help home health care provider Gladys Weatherly caring for Ann
Schranz by feeding Ms. Schranz and sitting with her in the evening until bedtime when her
duties, in fact, consisted of taking all physical care of Ms. Schranz, including bathing,
changing diapers, moving Ms. Schranz in and out of bed and/or her wheelchair, feeding, and
as-needed cooking and/or cleaning of the residence located in or around Des Plaines,
Illinois.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following
charge: “On or about September 8, 2010, while being interviewed by the Medical Integrity
Unit, Officer Moore made a false report, written or oral, when Officer Moore stated that she
would work four (4) to five (5) days a week caring for Ann Schranz and was paid between
$65 to $80/day when Moore was, in fact, paid approximately $120/day for her care of Ms.
Schranz for the time period of January 29, 2010, through July 28, 2010.”
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
The Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the
following charge: “On or about September 8, 2010, while being interviewed by the Medical
Integrity Unit, Officer Moore made a false report, written or oral, when Officer Moore stated
that the care she provided to Ann Schranz did not violate any of Officer Moore’s medical
restrictions per the Medical Services Section, when Officer Moore performed duties
including bathing, changing diapers, moving Ms. Schranz in and out of bed and/or her
wheelchair, feeding, and as-needed cooking and/or cleaning of Ms. Schranz’s residence that
would necessarily require her to violate the restriction to perform no work at all using the
affected extremity.
|
Rule 23 |
1 count
|
Failure to obey Department orders concerning other employment, occupation, or profession.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or on one or more
dates therein, Officer Moore failed to obey Department orders concerning other employment,
occupation, or profession, in that Officer Moore violated General Order 08-01 by working
secondary employment as a home health care worker and/or “aid assistant” to a home health
care provider for Ann Schranz when Officer Moore was on the medical roll.
|
Rule 24 |
1 count
|
Failure to follow medical roll procedures.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
From on or about January 5, 2010, through on or about July 29, 2010, or on one or more
dates therein, Officer Moore failed to follow medical roll procedures as stated in Employee
Resource E03-01-01, in that Officer Moore failed to comply with the instructions provided
by the Medical Services Section by working secondary employment as a home health care
worker and/or “aid assistant” to a home health care provider for Ann Schranz performing
duties including bathing, changing diapers, moving Ms. Schranz in and out of bed and/or her
wheelchair, feeding, and as-needed cooking and/or cleaning of Ms. Schranz’s residence that
would necessarily require Officer Moore to violate the restriction to perform no work at all
using the affected extremity.
|