Rule 1 |
2 counts
|
Violation of any law or ordinance.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No.
14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 1:Violation of any law or ordinance,in that:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, Officer Moore, while on duty, violated the United States Constitution’s Fourth Amendment
prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when he entered and/or searched the apartment of Brenda Hines without a warrant and/or consent and/or valid consent.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 1: Violation of any law or ordinance,in that:Count II: On or about February 4, 2009,
at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, Officer Moore, while on duty, violated the United States Constitution’s Fourth Amendment
prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when he pressured and/or coaxed and/or coerced and/or assisted in coercing Brenda Hines into signing the Consent to Search form.
|
Rule 2 |
5 counts
|
Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No.14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago,
Officer Moore, while on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department when he entered and/or searched the apartment of Brenda Hines without a warrant and/or consent and/or valid consent.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:
Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,
in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count II: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the
Department in that during a search of the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, Officer Moore handcuffed Kevin Hines without justification.
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:
Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,
in that:Count III: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while
on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that during a search of the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie
Avenue, Chicago,Officer Moore threatened and/or assisted in the threatening of Brenda Hines, without basis, that if she did not sign the Consent to Search form one or more people in the apartment would be arrested, or stated words to that effect.
-
Count 4
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:
Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,
in that:Count IV: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that he signed a Con
sent to Search form documenting that a valid and/or voluntary consent to search the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, was granted by Brenda Hines prior to the search of the apartment, when the form was signed after the search had been initiated.
-
Count 5
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its
policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that:
Count V: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that he signed a Consent to Search form documenting that a valid and/or voluntary consent to search the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue,
Chicago, was granted by Brenda Hines, when Brenda Hines signed the form after being threatened and/or pressured and/or coerced and/or coaxed.
|
Rule 8 |
2 counts
|
Disrespect to or maltreatment of any person, while on or off duty.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 8:
Disrespect to or maltreatment of any person, while on or off duty,
in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the
evidence the following charge:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, during a search of the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, disrespected and/or mistreated Kevin Hines when Officer Moore hand
cuffed Kevin Hines without justification.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 8: Disrespect to or maltreatment of any person, while on or off duty,in that:
Count II: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, during a search of the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, disrespected and/or mistreated Brenda Hines in that Officer Moore threatened and/or assisted in the threatening
of Brenda Hines, without basis, that if she did not sign the Consent to Search form one or more people in the apartment would be arrested, or stated words to that effect.
|
Rule 9 |
3 counts
|
Engaging in any unjustified verbal or physical altercation with any person, while on or off duty.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 9:
Engaging in any unjustified verbal or physical altercation with any person, while on or off duty,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, during a search of the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, engaged in an unjustified verbal or physical altercation with Kevin Hines when Officer Moore handcuffed Kevin Hines without justification.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 9:
Engaging in any unjustified verbal or physical altercation with any person, while on or off duty,in that:Count II: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, during a search of the
basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, engaged in an unjustified verbal or physical altercation with Brenda Hines when Officer Moore threatened and/or assisted in the threatening of Brenda Hines, without justification, that if she did not sign the Consent to Search form one or more people in the apartment would be arrested, or stated words to that effect
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 9:Engaging in any unjustified verbal or physical altercation with any person, while
on or off duty,in that:Count III: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, during a search of the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, engaged in an
unjustified verbal or physical altercation with Brenda Hines when Officer Moore pressured and/or coaxed and/or coerced and/or assisted in coercing Brenda Hines into signing the Consent to Search form, or stated words to that effect.
|
Rule 14 |
3 counts
|
Making a false report, written or oral.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:
Making a false report, written or oral, in that:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore made a false written report when he
signed a Consent to Search form documenting that a valid and/or voluntary consent to search the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, was granted by Brenda Hines prior to the search of the apartment, when the form was signed after the search
had been initiated.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:
Making a false report, written or oral,in that:Count II: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore made a false written report when he
signed a Consent to Search form documenting that a valid and/or voluntary consent to search the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, was granted by Brenda Hines, when Brenda Hines signed the form after being threatened and/or pressured
and/or coerced and/or coaxed.
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:
Making a false report, written or oral,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:
Count III: On or about March 25, 2009, during his interview with the Independent Police Review Authority (“IPRA”), Officer Moore made a false statement when he stated that Sergeant Jesse Terrazas was present during the consent to search incident at or about 4740
South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, on or about February 4, 2009, or stated words to that effect, when Sergeant Terrazas was not present.
|
Rule 38 |
3 counts
|
Unlawful or unnecessary use or display of a weapon.
-
Count 1
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 38:
Unlawful or unnecessary use or display of a weapon,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, in the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, unlawfully or unnecessarily displayed and/or pointed his gun at Kevin Hines.
-
Count 2
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 38:
Unlawful or unnecessary use or display of a weapon,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge Count II: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, in the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, unlawfully or unnecessarily displayed and/or pointed his gun at Willie Hines.
-
Count 3
Not Guilty
The Respondent, Police Officer Christopher Moore, Star No. 14830, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 38:
Unlawful or unnecessary use or display of a weapon,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count III: On or about February 4, 2009, Officer Moore, while on duty, in the basement apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, unlawfully or unnecessarily
displayed and/or pointed his gun at Gregory Butler.
|