Slawomir Plewa

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that: Count I: On or about
May 4, 2001, Plewa falsely reported and attested on his Personal
History Questionnaire (“Questionnaire”) that he had never been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter. Question number fifty seven (57) of the Questionnaire asked: “[h]ave you ever been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter?” Plewa was interviewed by Illinois State Police Special Agents Steve Loan (“Loan”) and Rich Packert (“Packert”) in connection with Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067 on or about February 26, 1999.Plewa’s actions have impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and brought discredit upon the Department.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that: Count II:
On or about July 11, 2001, Plewa falsified information elicited during his pre-employment interview when he affirmed to Detective Kenneth Pisano (“Pisano”) that he had never been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter. During this interview, Plewa affirmed his response of “no” to question number fifty-seven (57) of the Questionnaire.
Plewa’s actions in falsifying information elicited during his pre-employment interview have impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and brought discredit upon the Department.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that: Count III: At no time during his application process or employment with the Chicago Police
Department did Plewa disclose to the Department that he was involved in criminal conduct, as evidenced by Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067.Plewa’s failure to disclose his involvement in criminal case #98D3067 impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and brought discredit upon the Department.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2: Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that: Count IV: On or about January 17, 2008, Plewa gave false testimony in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Sylwia Marcinczyk, Case No. 07-CR-114861. Plewa’s actions in providing false testimony in a criminal case impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and brought discredit upon the Department.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:
Rule 2: Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,
in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: Count V: On or about August 19, 2010, Plewa gave false testimony in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Slawomir Plewa, Case No. 08-CR-19286. Plewa’s actions in providing false testimony in a criminal case impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and brought
discredit upon the Department.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 3:Any failure to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its policy or accomplish its goals,
in that: Count I: On or about May 4, 2001, Plewa falsely reported and attested on his Questionnaire that he had never been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter. Question number fifty-seven (57) of the Questionnaire asked: “[h]ave you ever been interviewed by the
police in a criminal matter?” Plewa was interviewed by Illinois State Police Special Agents Loan and Packert in connection with Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067 on or about February 26, 1999.
Plewa’s actions deprived the Department of its ability and opportunity to make an accurate assessment of his fitness and qualification for employment.As a result, Plewa’s actions failed to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its employment policy.
Likewise, Plewa’s actions prevented the Department from accomplishing its goal of selecting only the best candidates to serve as Probationary Police Officers.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit: Rule 3:Any failure to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its policy or accomplish its goals,in that: Count II: On or about July 11, 2001, Plewa reviewed his answers to the Questionnaire with Pisano. Plewa was not truthful when he indicated and swore to the fact that he had never
been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter. Question number fifty-seven (57) of the Questionnaire asked: “[h]ave you ever been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter?” Plewa was interviewed by Illinois State Police Special Agents Loan and Packert on or about
February 26, 1999, in connection with Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067. On or about July 11, 2001, Plewa attested to the accuracy of his representation in responding to question number fifty-seven (57). Plewa’s actions deprived the Department of its ability and
opportunity to make an accurate assessment of his fitness and qualification for employment. As a result, Plewa’s actions failed to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its employment policy. Likewise, Plewa’s actions prevented the Department from
accomplishing its goal of selecting only the best candidates to serve as Probationary Police Officers.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 3:Any failure to promote
the Department’s efforts to implement its policy or accomplish its goals,
in that: Count III: At no time during his application process or employment with the Chicago Police Department did Plewa disclose to the Department that he was involved in criminal conduct, as evidenced by Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067.Plewa’s failure to disclose his involvement in criminal case #98D3067 deprived the Department of its ability and opportunity to make an accurate assessment of his fitness and qualification for employment.
As a result, Plewa’s actions failed to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its employment policy. Likewise, Plewa’s actions prevented the Department from accomplishing its goal of selecting only the best candidates to serve as Probationary Police Officers.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 3:
Any failure to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its policy or accomplish its goals,in that: Count IV: On or about January 17, 2008, Plewa gave false testimony in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Sylwia Marcinczyk, Case No. 07-CR-114861. Plewa’s
actions failed to promote the Department’s policy, which requires police officers sworn under oath to provide truthful testimony in criminal cases.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 3:
Any failure to promote the Department’s efforts to implement its policy or accomplish its goals,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: Count V: On or about August 19, 2010, Plewa gave false testimony in the criminal case
The People of the State of Illinois v. Slawomir Plewa, Case No. 08-CR-1
9286. Plewa’s actions failed to promote the Department’s policy, which requires police officers sworn under oath to provide truthful testimony in criminal cases.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 5: Failure to perform any duty,in that: Count I: On or about May 4, 2001, Plewa
had a duty to truthfully respond to the questions posed in the
Questionnaire and failed to do so. On his Questionnaire, Plewa falsely reported and attested that he had never been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter. Question number fifty-seven (57) of the Questionnaire asked: “[h]ave you ever been interviewed by
the police in a criminal matter?” Plewa was interviewed by Illinois State Police Special Agents Loan and Packert in connection with Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067 on or about February 26, 1999.
Plewa’s actions constitute a failure to perform his duty.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is guiltyof violating, to wit:Rule 5: Failure to perform any duty, in that: Count II: On or about July 11, 2001, Plewa reviewed his answers to the Questionnaire with Pisano. Plewa had a duty to provide truthful information during his review of the Questionnaire with Pisano. He was not truthful when he indicated and swore to the fact that he had never been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter in his response to question number fifty-seven (57). Plewa was interviewed by Illinois State Police Special Agents Loan
and Packert on or about February 26, 1999, in connection with Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067. Plewa’s actions constitute a failure to perform his duty.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 5: Failure to perform any duty, in that: Count III: At no time during his application process or employment with the Chicago Police Department did Plewa disclose to the Department that he was involved in criminal conduct,
as evidenced by Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067. Plewa had a duty to disclose such information to the Department.
Plewa’s actions constitute a failure to perform his duty
.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 5: Failure to perform any duty, in that: Count IV: On or about January 17, 2008, Plewa had a duty to testify truthfully in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Sylwia Marcinczyk, Case No. 07-CR-114861, and failed to do so.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 5: Failure to perform any duty,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: Count V: On or about August 19, 2010, Plewa had a duty to testify truthfully in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Slawomir Plewa, Case No. 08-CR19286, and failed to do so.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 11:Incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of duty,in that: Count I: On or about
January 17, 2008, Plewa provided false testimony in the criminal case
The People of the State of Illinois v. Sylwia Marcinczyk, Case No. 07-CR-114861. Plewa’s actions constitute incompetency and inefficiency in the performance of his duty as a Chicago Police Department officer.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 11:
Incompetency or inefficiency in the performance of duty,in
that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: Count II: On or about August 19, 2010, Plewa provided false testimony in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Slawomir Plewa, Case No. 08-CR-19286. Plewa’s
actions constitute incompetency and inefficiency in the performance of his duty as a Chicago Police Department officer.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No.
14604, charged herein, isguilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:Making a false report, written or oral,in that: Count I: On or about May 4, 2001, Plewa falsely reported that he had never been interviewed
by the police in a criminal matter on his Questionnaire. Question number fifty-seven (57) of the Questionnaire asked: “[h]ave you ever been interviewed by the police in a criminal matter?” Plewa was interviewed by Illinois State Police Special Agents Loan and Packert in
connection with Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067 on or about February 26, 1999.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604,
charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:Making a false report, written or oral,in that: Count II: On or about July 11, 2001, Plewa falsified information elicited during his pre-employment interview when he affirmed to Pisano that he had never been interviewed by the
police in a criminal matter. During his interview, Plewa affirmed his response of “no” to question number fifty-seven (57) of the Questionnaire.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:Making a false report, written or oral,in that: Count III: On or about January 17, 2008, Plewa gave false testimony in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Sylwia Marcinczyk, Case No. 07-CR-114861.

On or about August 19, 2010, Plewa gave false testimony in the criminal case The People of the State of Illinois v. Slawomir Plewa, Case No. 08-CR-19286.

The Respondent, Police Officer Slawomir Plewa, Star No. 14604, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 21: Failure to report promptly to the Department any information concerning any crime or other unlawful action,in that: At no time during his application process or employment with the Chicago Police Department did Plewa disclose to the Department that he was involved in criminal conduct, as evidenced by Illinois State Police criminal case #98D3067.