Carl Carter

The Respondent Police Officer Carl Carter, Star No. 16352, is hereby found: A. Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count I), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1)(a) and (e), and General Order 99-01 V (A)(3), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote;

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count I) to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a vote of 8-1, with Member Bobb dissenting;

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count II), for violating a direct order to terminate a vehicle chase, by a unanimous vote;

Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count III), charging him with failure to immediately summon medical attention for Latanya Haggerty, by a unanimous vote;

Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count IV), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, but he is not guilty of violating General Order 99-01 V (B) (1) only to the extent that these reports involved the details of the incidents at 64tn and King Drive on June 4, 1999, by a unanimous vote;

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count IV), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, to the extent that these reports involved the details of the incidents at 95 th and Cottage Grove on June 4, 1999, by a vote of 5-4, Members Bobb, Smith, Miller and Velcich dissenting;

Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count V), charging him with engaging in excessive force against Raymond Smith, by a unanimous vote;

Charging him with engaging in excessive force against Raymond Smith, by a unanimous vote

For giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that Raymond Smith used his vehicle as a weapon against these officers, by a unanimous vote

For giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that Raymond Smith used his vehicle as a weapon against these officers, by a unanimous vote

Charging him with giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that his radio was broken on June 4, 1999, by a unanimous vote

To the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1)(a) and (e), and General Order 99-01 V (A)(3), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote

Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count I) to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a vote of 8-1, with Member Bobb dissenting;

Not Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count I), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1)(a) and (e), and General Order 99-01 V (A)(3), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote;

L.Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count II), for violating a direct order to terminate a vehicle chase, by a unanimous vote;

M. Not Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count III), charging him with ailure to immediately summon medical attention for Latanya Haggerty, by a unanimous vote;

N.Not Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count, IV), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V (B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, but he is not guilty of violating General Order 99-01 V (B) (1) only to the extent that these reports involved the details of the incidents at 64th and King Drive on June 4, 1999, by a unanimous vote;

Not Guilty of violating Rule 8, charging him with engaging in excessive force against Raymond Smith, by a unanimous vote;

Guilty of violating Rule 14 (Count I) for giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that Raymond Smith used his vehicle as a weapon against these officers, by a unanimous vote, and

Not Guilty of violating Rule 14 (Count II), charging him with giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that his radio was broken on June 4, 1999, by a unanimous vote.