Stafford Wilson

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Count 1 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count I), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1) (a) and General Order 99-01 V (B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote, except that Member Bobb dissents from the finding on General 99-01 V (B)(1); Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count I), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1)(e) and General 99-01 V (A)(3), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote, except that Members Apelbaum, Davis, Carney and Gonzalez dissent the finding on General Order 99-01 V(A)(1)(e);

Count 2 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count II), for violating a direct order to terminate a vehicle chase, by a unanimous vote;

Count 3 Not Guilty

Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count III), charging him with failure to immediately summon medical attention for Latanya Haggerty, by a unanimous vote;

Count 4 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count IV), for failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 86-8 IV (E), when he fired his weapon without justification at a fleeing vehicle, by a unanimous vote;

Count 5 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count V), to the extent that it charges him with failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon but only to the extent that these reports involved the incidents that occurred at 95th and Cottage Grove on June 4, 1999 by a vote of 5-4, Members Bobb, Smith, Miller and Velcich dissenting; Not Guilty of violating Rule 2 (Count V), to the extent that it charges him with failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon but only to the extent that these reports involved the incidents that occurred at 64th and King Drive on June 4, 1999 by unanimous vote;

Count 6 Not Guilty

To the extent it charges him with failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon but only to the extent that these reports involved the incidents that occurred at 95 th and Cottage Grove on June 4

Count 7 Not Guilty

To the extent it charges him with failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports fdllowing the discharge of a weappn but only to the extent that these reports involved the incidents that occurred at 64 th and King Drive on June 4, 1999

Count 8 Not Guilty

For giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that Raymond Smith used his vehicle as a weapon against these officers

Count 9 Not Guilty

When he fired his weapon without justification at a fleeing vehicle

Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.

Count 1 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count I), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1) (e) and General Order 99-01 V (A)(3), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote, except that Members Apelbaum, Davis, Carney and Gonzalez dissent from the finding on General Order 99-01 V(A)(1)(e); Not Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count I), to the extent that it charges him with failure to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A) (1)(e) and General Order 99-01 V (A)(3), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon, by a unanimous vote, except that Members Apelbaum, Davis, Carney and Gonzalez dissent from the finding on General Order 99-01 V(A)(1)(e);

Count 2 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count II), for violating a direct order to terminate a vehicle chase, by a unanimous vote;

Count 3 Not Guilty

Not Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count III), charging him with failure to immediately summon medical attention for Latanya Haggerty, by a unanimous vote;

Count 4 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count IV), for failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 86-8 IV (E), when he fired his weapon without justification at a fleeing vehicle, by a unanimous vote;

Count 5 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count V), to the extent that it charges him with failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon but only to the extent that these reports involved the incidents that occurred at 95th and Cottage Grove on June 4, 1999 by a vote of 5-4, Members Bobb, Smith, Miller and Velcich dissenting; Not Guilty of violating Rule 6 (Count V), to the extent that it charges him with failing to adhere to the provisions of General Order 99-01 V (A)(3) and V(B)(1), requiring certain reports following the discharge of a weapon but only to the extent that these reports involved the incidents that occurred at 64th and King Drive on June 4, 1999 by unanimous vote;

Making a false report, written or oral.

Count 1 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 14, for giving false information in his OPS statement, when he stated that Raymond Smith used his vehicle as a weapon against these officers, by a unanimous vote; and

Unlawful or unnecessary use or display of a weapon.

Count 1 Not Guilty

Guilty of violating Rule 38, when he fired his weapon without justification at a fleeing vehicle, by a unanimous vote.