| Rule 1 |
2 counts
|
Violation of any law or ordinance.
-
Count 1
In that on or about April 10, 2000, she committed the offense of Obtaining Control Over Card As Security For Debt With Intent To Defraud, in that she contacted a florist and ordered one or more flowers using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card, without his consent, thereby violating 720 ILCS 250/7. In that on or about April 10, 2000, she committed the offense of Obtaining Control Over Card As Security For Debt With Intent To Defraud, in that she contacted a florist and ordered one or more flowers using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card, without his consent, thereby violating 720 ILCS 250/7. In that on or about April 10, 2000, she committed the offense of Obtaining Control Over Card As Security For Debt With Intent To Defraud, in that she contacted a florist and ordered one or more flowers using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card, without his consent, thereby violating 720 ILCS 250/7.
-
Count 2
In that in or about June 2000, on one or more occasions, she committed the offense of Obtaining Control Over Card As Security For Debt With Intent To Defraud, in that she contacted one or more hotels in Chicago, Illinois, and reserved one or more rooms for one or more nights in or about June 2000, using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card, without his consent, resulting in a charge to his account, thereby violating 720 ILCS 250/7. In that in or about June 2000, on one or more occasions, she committed the offense of Obtaining Control Over Card As Security For Debt With Intent To Defraud, in that she contacted one or more hotels in Chicago, Illinois, and reserved one or more rooms for one or more nights in or about June 2000, using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card, without his consent, resulting in a charge to his account, thereby violating 720 ILCS 250/7.
|
| Rule 2 |
4 counts
|
Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 1
In that on or about April 10, 2000, she contacted a florist and ordered one or more flowers using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card without his consent, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 2
In that in or about June 2000, on one or more occasions, she contacted one or more hotels in Chicago, Illinois, and reserved one or more rooms for one or more nights, using Derek Rhodes' credit/debit card, without his
consent, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 3
In that in or about April 2000, she attempted to charge an amount of money for a trip, using Derek Rhodes' credit card, without his consent, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.
-
Count 4
In that in or about August 2000, she failed to immediately submit a report to her commanding officer when she was notified by a member of a Police Department other than the Chicago Police Department, that she was a suspect, and/or under investigation, in an investigation being conducted by that police department, thereby impeding the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.
|
| Rule 6 |
2 counts
|
Disobedience of an order or directive, whether written or oral.
-
Count 1
In that on or about August 20, 2000, she was notified by a member of a Police Department other than the Chicago Police Department, that she was named as a suspect, and/or was under investigation, in an investigation, being conducted by that police department other than the Chicago Police Department, and she failed to immediately submit a report to her commanding officer, thereby violating the provisions of General Order 93-3, Addendum 5, IV-A.
-
Count 2
In that on or about August 27, 2000, having been advised by a member of a Police Department other than the Chicago Police Department, that she was a suspect in an investigation, and/or was under investigation, appeared at the office of that police department, other than the Chicago Police Department, was read her Miranda rights and gave a statement that was videotaped with her knowledge and subsequently, failed to immediately submit a report to her commanding officer, thereby violating the provisions of General Order 93-3, Addendum 5, IV-A.
|
| Rule 20 |
3 counts
|
Failure to submit immediately a written report that any member, including self, is under investigation by any law enforcement agency other than the Chicago Police Department.
-
Count 1
In that in or about August 2000, she was notified by a member of a Police Department other than the Chicago Police Department, that she was named as a suspect, and/or was under investigation, in an investigation being conducted by that police department, other than the Chicago Police
Department, and she failed to immediately submit a report to her commanding officer.
-
Count 2
In that in or about August 2000, having been advised by a member of a Police Department other than the Chicago Police Department, that she was a suspect in an investigation, and/or was under investigation, appeared at the office of that police department, other than the Chicago Police Department, was read her Miranda Rights and gave a statement that was videotaped with her knowledge and, subsequently, failed to immediately submit a report to her commanding officer.
-
Count 3
On or about February 20, 2000, Officer Robert Niziolek submitted to a Breath Alcohol Test which results revealed that he had a blood alcohol level of approximately 0.225%, thus being intoxicated while off duty.
|
From the Chicago Justice Project, dedicated to bringing transparency to Chicago's justice system.
